Civil Liberties

The 2006 case, United States v. J iodines, revisited a precise important issue that has been and continues to be difficult to tactic as the interpretation expected secrecy constantly changes with our constantly changing world. In 2008 Antoine Jones was sentenced to life in prisons for conspiracy to distribute and to experience with intent to distribute quint or to a greater extent kilograms of cocain and 50 or more grams of cocaine base. The United States v. Knotts, on which the prosecutors relied, helped validate the function of some(prenominal) of data obtained from the GPS tracking ruse. In the appeal that resulted in discompose of Jones conviction, it argued that although, in Knotts,(a) mortal locomotion in an automobile on public thoroughfares has no comely expectation of retirement in his movements from one place to some other, this does not imply to movements whatsoever. In Knotts, the defendant was track from file A to B (100 mile), whereas Jones was tracke d 24 hours a daylight for 4 weeks. Because some motor lodges deemed the use of a GPS tracking device not a assay  therefore not a violation of the stern amendment and the court of appeals did, immediate clarification was needed. In 2011 the US Supreme coquette grant the petition for writ of Certiorari, which is a document that a losing party files with the Supreme tourist court asking the Supreme apostrophize to review the decision of a lower court. In this documents, it presented the question Whether the warrantless use of a tracking device on respondents vehicle to monitor its movements on public streets violated the fourth amendments.  \nTo protect citizens against electronic rape in places a one would consider private, the Harlans reasonable-expectation-of-privacy test was employed, booting appear the previous common- fair play pryory test. This has created a path of opportunity for law enforcement to physically and technically trespass on ones property if deeme d person had no expectation of privacy . In summary, th...