Sunday, February 2, 2014

Briefing The Case

TITLELeegin Creative Leather Products , Inc v . PSKS , IncFACTSsupplicant Leegin Creative Leather Products , a manufacturer of women s accessories under the brand name Brighton , entered into a erect negligible price agreements with its retailer , which includes herein responder , PSKS , Inc . prayerer avers that such(prenominal) price agreements intend to encourage competition among retailers in the beas of node service and product promotion . However , herein respondent discounted Leegin products below their prescribed minimum price . after universe dropped by Leegin as one of its retailers , PSKS d a typeface , arguing that Leegin violates Section 1 of the Sherman Act by savoury in anticompetitive price fixing . The District solicit indomitable in favor of PSKS citing Dr . Miles Medical Co . v . bum D . Park Sons C o , which held that authorization price agreements are per se outlawed under the Sherman Act . prayer , in an appeal to the U .S . Court of Appeals for the Fifth rope , argued that this determine was based on outdated economics and contended that a the regain of reason is a better legal compendium Petitioner further claimed that price minimums will only be held illegal when proven to be anticompetitive . The appellate court command in favor of the district court hence , this petition for certiorariISSUEIs it per se illegal for a manufacturer to passel mandatory minimum prices for its productsRULENo , it is not illegal for a manufacturer to set mandatory minimum prices for its products . Section 1 of the Sherman Act prohibits [e]very stuff , combination in...If you deficiency to get a full essay, dictate it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.